participation in sports although the new guidelines have allowed schools to cut back athletic opportunities if they find out from Internet surveys the students are BandarQ.
But, critics have been quick to point out that these new guidelines have significantly weakened the legislation that’s been set up for the previous 33 decades, which had outlawed discrimination based on sex in schools that were recipients of federal funds.
According to the new guidelines, the Education Department has allowed schools to prove they are offering opportunities by asking the pupils to fill a form over the Internet to reveal their interest in sports. The colleges are free to alert the pupils of a survey through e-mail. In the event that the surveys get few responses, the colleges can go a head and use the limited responses to argue against the creation of new teams in a given game of their sex which is not correctly represented.
Chaundry voiced concern saying students may actually fail to open this kind of e-mail. He continued to add it would be simpler for colleges jointly with colleges to maintain their case in court when they have fewer girls in a given athletic program compared to the entire number of students in the school or college. The principle has had controversies especially in certain schools in which less practiced men’s sports say, wrestling, needed to be turned off to balance out the number of women and men engaging in athletics considering the total number of students at the school or college.
Well, a lot of people will argue that Title IX has been good for women’s sports. Largely that is true but what has been the cost for it? The legislation was founded on the premise that universities that received national funding could not use sex as means of discrimination. However, by trying to fix the issue of fewer women involvement in sport, Title IX has really discriminated against men!